| Type | Valuation Ratio |
| Formula | P/E ÷ Earnings Growth % |
| Fair Value | 1.0 |
| Undervalued | < 1.0 |
| Overvalued | > 2.0 |
| Invented By | Peter Lynch |
formulaPEG = (Price / Earnings per Share) ÷ Annual EPS Growth Rate
= P/E Ratio ÷ EPS Growth %
Both sides of the equation use earnings per share (EPS). The P/E ratio tells you how many dollars investors pay per dollar of current earnings. The growth rate tells you how fast those earnings are expanding. PEG divides one by the other.
| Stock | Price | EPS | P/E | EPS Growth | PEG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company A | $150 | $5.00 | 30.0 | 30% | 1.00 |
| Company B | $100 | $5.00 | 20.0 | 10% | 2.00 |
| Company C | $50 | $5.00 | 10.0 | 15% | 0.67 |
Company A has the highest P/E (30) but is fairly valued because earnings growth matches. Company B looks cheaper on P/E (20) but is actually the most expensive on a growth-adjusted basis. Company C is the cheapest — the market is underpricing its growth.
| PEG Range | Signal | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| < 1.0 | Undervalued | Market is not fully pricing in the growth rate. Potential opportunity if growth estimates are reliable. |
| 1.0 | Fair value | The stock is priced proportionally to its growth. No discount, no premium. Peter Lynch's "perfectly priced" zone. |
| 1.0 – 2.0 | Moderate premium | Investors are paying some premium for growth. Acceptable for high-quality, predictable businesses. |
| > 2.0 | Overvalued | Growth premium is stretched. Either growth expectations are too low, or the stock is genuinely expensive. |
| Negative | Invalid | Earnings are declining. PEG breaks when growth is negative — discard the result and use other metrics. |
A PEG of 1.0 implies the market expects the earnings growth rate to justify the current price. If a stock trades at 25x earnings with a 25% growth rate, the market is saying: "We'll pay 25 dollars per dollar of earnings because we believe earnings will be 25% higher next year." Whether that belief is correct is a different question.
referencePEG < 0.5 │ Rare. Usually signals the market sees risk the
│ numbers don't show (debt, regulation, cyclical peak).
│
PEG 0.5–1.0│ Value territory. Common in out-of-favor sectors
│ (energy, financials) or post-selloff tech names.
│
PEG 1.0–1.5│ The sweet spot for GARP (Growth at a Reasonable
│ Price) investors. Fair value with slight margin.
│
PEG 1.5–2.5│ Growth premium. Typical for large-cap tech with
│ strong moats (MSFT, GOOGL, AAPL).
│
PEG > 3.0 │ Priced for perfection. Any earnings miss and the
│ stock gets punished. High-conviction-only territory.
The PEG ratio is only as good as the growth number you plug in. This is where most mistakes happen.
| Approach | Source | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trailing PEG | Past 12 months (TTM) EPS growth | Objective — based on reported numbers, no guessing | Backward-looking. Growth may be accelerating or decelerating. |
| Forward PEG | Analyst consensus estimates (next 12 months) | Forward-looking — prices in expected trajectory | Analyst estimates are frequently wrong, especially for cyclicals. |
| 5-Year PEG | Expected 5-year annual EPS CAGR | Smooths short-term noise | Highly speculative. 5-year growth estimates are educated guesses at best. |
formulaTrailing EPS Growth (YoY):
growth_rate = ((EPS_current - EPS_prior) / |EPS_prior|) × 100
Example:
EPS 2025: $6.20
EPS 2024: $5.00
growth_rate = ((6.20 - 5.00) / 5.00) × 100 = 24%
If current P/E = 30:
PEG = 30 / 24 = 1.25
PEG is most useful when comparing stocks within the same sector. Cross-sector comparisons are misleading because baseline growth rates differ structurally:
| Sector | Typical P/E | Typical Growth | Typical PEG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 25–40 | 15–30% | 1.2–2.0 |
| Healthcare | 18–30 | 10–20% | 1.3–2.0 |
| Financials | 10–16 | 5–12% | 1.0–1.8 |
| Consumer Staples | 20–28 | 5–8% | 2.5–4.0 |
| Energy | 8–15 | Cyclical | Unreliable |
PEG works best as a first-pass filter. Screen a universe for PEG < 1.5, then do the real work: read the 10-K, check the balance sheet, understand the competitive position.
pseudocodeScreen:
1. Filter: PEG < 1.5
2. Filter: Market cap > $10B (liquidity)
3. Filter: Positive FCF (business is real)
4. Sort: PEG ascending
Result: A shortlist of growth stocks the market may be underpricing.
Then: Read the actual filings for each name on the list.
PEG should never be used in isolation. Pair it with:
Lynch's original formulation was simple: a fairly valued company has a PEG of 1.0. He considered any stock with a PEG below 0.5 a strong buy and anything above 2.0 overpriced. He also added the dividend yield as a modifier:
formulaLynch Adjusted PEG = P/E ÷ (EPS Growth Rate + Dividend Yield)
Example:
P/E: 18
EPS Growth: 12%
Dividend Yield: 3%
Adjusted PEG = 18 / (12 + 3) = 1.20
This penalizes non-dividend payers and rewards companies returning cash to shareholders while still growing. It shifts the lens toward total return, not just earnings expansion.
The numerator of the PEG formula. P/E measures what investors pay per dollar of earnings — PEG normalizes that against growth.
How PEG scores feed into position sizing. Lower PEG names receive higher allocation weights in the rebalancing framework.
The critical companion metric. FCF yield confirms that reported earnings translate to real cash generation.